COVID-19: PLANDEMIC. PROFIT.FALLOUT
[An Open Letter to Power]
Summary: COVID-19: PLANDEMIC. PROFIT. FALLOUT
[An Open Letter to Power]
[An Open Letter to Power]
The information in this letter is intended to facilitate discussion and a more rigorous examination and challenge of the Australian government’s Covid-19 mitigation policies.
PART ONE: PLANDEMIC
The novel coronavirus ‘Covid-19’ has been deemed a highly infectious pathogen and an international public health risk. The unprecedented international response has resulted in economic devastation and the virtual house arrest of billions of people. I discuss concerns surrounding the irregularities of initial diagnosis and testing procedures. There appears to be an absence of any “gold standard” test, or control groups to assess accuracy of diagnostics. Instead, without external validation, “emergency approval” has been granted by the WHO and national health authorities. Regulators like Australia's TGA acknowledge possible inaccuracies - saying there is a possibility of false positives AND false negatives, but do not state the prevalence to which this is to be expected. Regardless, the WHO and governments are pushing wide-scale, mass genetic testing.
I explore the data used in informing the Covid-19 policy response. Data which governments are relying on can be traced back to dubious sources, including social media and local news reports.
International health authorities are engaging in irregular Covid-19 death attribution. Some hospitals are allegedly financially incentivised to declare Covid-19 cases.
The modelling used for international policy is based on unpublished, unverified 13 year old code. Australian modellers have appear to have deep financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and conflicted global power structures such as the Gates Foundation and Gavi (Vaccine Alliance).
I discuss the dark possibility of the Covid-19 ‘plandemic’ - involving a series of high profile pandemic scenarios involving the military, G20 members and global organisations like the World Economic Forum and the Gates Foundation. These ‘plandemic’ scenarios have deeply unsettling parallels to the current Covid-19 outbreak. I note one of the key advisors to the Australian government’s Covid-19 response was a member of one of these high level ‘plandemic’ panels, which involved the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation and organisations tied to the US military.
I intend to pose the question - how many coincidences are required before we begin to consider a causal agent?
I outline the relationships of Australian government organisations and vaccine manufacturers, and the troubling timelines of their Covid-19 vaccine development - which appear to have pre-empted the current crisis.
I examine the ‘unprecedented, unchecked’ powers given to Health Minister Greg Hunt and Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy under the Biosecurity Act 2015, and Minister Hunt’s history as an apparent ‘friend of Big Pharma’.
PART TWO: PROFIT
I examine the pervasive influence of Big Pharma over the Australian government, concluding that “Big Pharma is gaming the government” and using the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme to siphon off billions from Australian taxpayers. Vaccines are a highly lucrative product - given their mass market potential and eligibility for taxpayer funded rebates.
I note the grotesque conflicts of interest in Australia’s drug regulators, advisors, researchers and inventors. The “regulatory capture” by pharmaceutical companies is deeply concerning - given that in the response to Covid-19, all options - including mass mandatory vaccination - appear to be on the table.
I conduct a case study of “regulatory capture”, showing evidence of a former Prime Minister who personally profited from ‘medically coercive’ legislation passed under his government.
I examine the role of organisations and people playing an instrumental role in the Australian government’s Covid-19 response, including the Doherty Institute. I demonstrate serious implications of potential financial conflicts of interest. Modellers recommending the draconian lockdown of Australia, which has resulted in economic devastation and societal ruin, appear financially incentivised to keep lockdown in place until their own vaccines are ready for manufacture.
I explore the relationship between the Australian media and pharmaceutical companies, with sensationalist media stories acting as an advertising funnel to drug companies, including the garnering of Australian children for profitable clinical drug trials. I draw parallels to the media’s current obsessive coverage of Covid-19, and the lack of balanced reporting.
A case study of the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic reveals a European Parliamentary inquiry determined that WHO manipulated information to fraudulently declare a pandemic, activating lucrative ‘sleeping contracts’ with pharmaceutical companies. It is also revealed that the Australian Department of Health misrepresented statistical data to alarm the public about swine flu, although this was unjustified. The government ordered vaccines prepared before there was any evidence that swine flu was more serious than other strains of flu.
I examine the Imperialist ‘pharmaceutical colonialism’ of the Gates Foundation, an organisation which is highly influential in determining global health policy. The World Health Organisation’s International Health Regulations are legally binding, with Australia as a signatory.
The Gates Foundation operates under a banner of philanthropy, but their deep financial ties to biotech and pharmaceutical companies show evidence of their true purpose - to facilitate the transfer of vast swathes of public money to drug companies. The Gates Foundation also profits as one of the world's largest investors in biotech and pharmaceutical/vaccine companies.
I reference numerous examples of deeply unethical and predatory practices of the Gates Foundation- revealing their claim of ‘philanthropy’ to be an abomination. These examples include an Indian parliamentary Inquiry which found the Foundation was partnering with drug companies to conduct illegal medical experimentation on tens of thousands of children. State-funded Australian organisations are now partnering one of these companies to develop a Covid-19 vaccine. I expose a disturbing revelation - the Australian government is collaborating with the Gates foundation to commit public funding to projects which increase poverty and starvation in developing nations, to the obscene profit of biotech companies.
PART THREE: FALLOUT
I explore Western world leaders, including Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who appear adamant that “life will not go back to what it was” until there is a Covid-19 vaccine. The proposal of ‘digital vaccine certificates’ to prove immunity is gaining traction, an idea originally proposed by the Gates Foundation and Gates-funded Gavi (Vaccine Alliance).
Particularly concerning is the global drive to 'fast-track' Covid-19 vaccines approval to a matter of months rather than years. Especially given that many of these are RNA/DNA 'experimental vaccines', which involve directly injecting genetic material into people. These types of vaccines have never been approved for human use before.
I examine the conflicts of interest surrounding the Victorian government’s extreme policing response to the ‘pandemic’ and officials’ stated intention to mandate a Covid-19 vaccine. I expose the State government’s history of alliance with pharmaceutical companies and the State’s apparent financial incentive to legislate mandatory vaccination.
I expose the financial devastation of lockdown policy, and Covid-19 legislation that favours the rich.
The swift rise of the international Bio-Surveillance State appears coordinated, with leaders of the movement also involved in the high-level “plandemic preparedness” exercises.
I examine the new partnerships between Big Tech and governments, involving companies with deep ties to intelligence agencies. Tracking, big data and genetic surveillance is being rapidly pushed by government, military and intelligence organisations to ‘combat Covid-19’, enabling ‘structural reforms’ that the public would not have accepted without the pandemic narrative.
I discuss the plethora of international human rights violations conducted under the guise of ‘fighting Covid-19’ and conclude that the sweeping power re-allocation may have forever altered the relationship between citizen and state.
The novel coronavirus ‘Covid-19’ has been deemed a highly infectious pathogen and an international public health risk. The unprecedented international response has resulted in economic devastation and the virtual house arrest of billions of people. I discuss concerns surrounding the irregularities of initial diagnosis and testing procedures. There appears to be an absence of any “gold standard” test, or control groups to assess accuracy of diagnostics. Instead, without external validation, “emergency approval” has been granted by the WHO and national health authorities. Regulators like Australia's TGA acknowledge possible inaccuracies - saying there is a possibility of false positives AND false negatives, but do not state the prevalence to which this is to be expected. Regardless, the WHO and governments are pushing wide-scale, mass genetic testing.
I explore the data used in informing the Covid-19 policy response. Data which governments are relying on can be traced back to dubious sources, including social media and local news reports.
International health authorities are engaging in irregular Covid-19 death attribution. Some hospitals are allegedly financially incentivised to declare Covid-19 cases.
The modelling used for international policy is based on unpublished, unverified 13 year old code. Australian modellers have appear to have deep financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and conflicted global power structures such as the Gates Foundation and Gavi (Vaccine Alliance).
I discuss the dark possibility of the Covid-19 ‘plandemic’ - involving a series of high profile pandemic scenarios involving the military, G20 members and global organisations like the World Economic Forum and the Gates Foundation. These ‘plandemic’ scenarios have deeply unsettling parallels to the current Covid-19 outbreak. I note one of the key advisors to the Australian government’s Covid-19 response was a member of one of these high level ‘plandemic’ panels, which involved the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation and organisations tied to the US military.
I intend to pose the question - how many coincidences are required before we begin to consider a causal agent?
I outline the relationships of Australian government organisations and vaccine manufacturers, and the troubling timelines of their Covid-19 vaccine development - which appear to have pre-empted the current crisis.
I examine the ‘unprecedented, unchecked’ powers given to Health Minister Greg Hunt and Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy under the Biosecurity Act 2015, and Minister Hunt’s history as an apparent ‘friend of Big Pharma’.
PART TWO: PROFIT
I examine the pervasive influence of Big Pharma over the Australian government, concluding that “Big Pharma is gaming the government” and using the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme to siphon off billions from Australian taxpayers. Vaccines are a highly lucrative product - given their mass market potential and eligibility for taxpayer funded rebates.
I note the grotesque conflicts of interest in Australia’s drug regulators, advisors, researchers and inventors. The “regulatory capture” by pharmaceutical companies is deeply concerning - given that in the response to Covid-19, all options - including mass mandatory vaccination - appear to be on the table.
I conduct a case study of “regulatory capture”, showing evidence of a former Prime Minister who personally profited from ‘medically coercive’ legislation passed under his government.
I examine the role of organisations and people playing an instrumental role in the Australian government’s Covid-19 response, including the Doherty Institute. I demonstrate serious implications of potential financial conflicts of interest. Modellers recommending the draconian lockdown of Australia, which has resulted in economic devastation and societal ruin, appear financially incentivised to keep lockdown in place until their own vaccines are ready for manufacture.
I explore the relationship between the Australian media and pharmaceutical companies, with sensationalist media stories acting as an advertising funnel to drug companies, including the garnering of Australian children for profitable clinical drug trials. I draw parallels to the media’s current obsessive coverage of Covid-19, and the lack of balanced reporting.
A case study of the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic reveals a European Parliamentary inquiry determined that WHO manipulated information to fraudulently declare a pandemic, activating lucrative ‘sleeping contracts’ with pharmaceutical companies. It is also revealed that the Australian Department of Health misrepresented statistical data to alarm the public about swine flu, although this was unjustified. The government ordered vaccines prepared before there was any evidence that swine flu was more serious than other strains of flu.
I examine the Imperialist ‘pharmaceutical colonialism’ of the Gates Foundation, an organisation which is highly influential in determining global health policy. The World Health Organisation’s International Health Regulations are legally binding, with Australia as a signatory.
The Gates Foundation operates under a banner of philanthropy, but their deep financial ties to biotech and pharmaceutical companies show evidence of their true purpose - to facilitate the transfer of vast swathes of public money to drug companies. The Gates Foundation also profits as one of the world's largest investors in biotech and pharmaceutical/vaccine companies.
I reference numerous examples of deeply unethical and predatory practices of the Gates Foundation- revealing their claim of ‘philanthropy’ to be an abomination. These examples include an Indian parliamentary Inquiry which found the Foundation was partnering with drug companies to conduct illegal medical experimentation on tens of thousands of children. State-funded Australian organisations are now partnering one of these companies to develop a Covid-19 vaccine. I expose a disturbing revelation - the Australian government is collaborating with the Gates foundation to commit public funding to projects which increase poverty and starvation in developing nations, to the obscene profit of biotech companies.
PART THREE: FALLOUT
I explore Western world leaders, including Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who appear adamant that “life will not go back to what it was” until there is a Covid-19 vaccine. The proposal of ‘digital vaccine certificates’ to prove immunity is gaining traction, an idea originally proposed by the Gates Foundation and Gates-funded Gavi (Vaccine Alliance).
Particularly concerning is the global drive to 'fast-track' Covid-19 vaccines approval to a matter of months rather than years. Especially given that many of these are RNA/DNA 'experimental vaccines', which involve directly injecting genetic material into people. These types of vaccines have never been approved for human use before.
I examine the conflicts of interest surrounding the Victorian government’s extreme policing response to the ‘pandemic’ and officials’ stated intention to mandate a Covid-19 vaccine. I expose the State government’s history of alliance with pharmaceutical companies and the State’s apparent financial incentive to legislate mandatory vaccination.
I expose the financial devastation of lockdown policy, and Covid-19 legislation that favours the rich.
The swift rise of the international Bio-Surveillance State appears coordinated, with leaders of the movement also involved in the high-level “plandemic preparedness” exercises.
I examine the new partnerships between Big Tech and governments, involving companies with deep ties to intelligence agencies. Tracking, big data and genetic surveillance is being rapidly pushed by government, military and intelligence organisations to ‘combat Covid-19’, enabling ‘structural reforms’ that the public would not have accepted without the pandemic narrative.
I discuss the plethora of international human rights violations conducted under the guise of ‘fighting Covid-19’ and conclude that the sweeping power re-allocation may have forever altered the relationship between citizen and state.